Skip to main content

Power

Teaching and learning takes place in a context shaped by power dynamics. Most obviously, only the teacher controls grades and credits—but other dimensions also create power differences not only between faculty and student but also between student and student: different levels of comfort in the educational environment, familiarity with class norms, identity, and perceived authority. As power is associated with dominant identities, this can make dynamics complex between faculty and students if a student has largely dominant identities and if the faculty member’s identities have been historically marginalized. Intentionally taking note of all these dynamics and reflecting on your own identities and positions—and perhaps sharing these reflections explicitly with the class—can help you navigate this complex social space. When possible, you can also shape the class to give students more agency over their experience. These choices invite the whole student to the learning experience, and empower them to become competent, self-directed life-long learners.

When feasible, involve students directly in shaping your syllabus and pedagogical choices

Why does this matter?

How can faculty empower students to be curious, engaged, and self-directed life-long learners (Baxter-Magolda, 2004)? Doing so requires respecting the dignity of students (Siegel, 2017) as well as providing opportunities for them to exercise agency over their learning. Co-creation of the learning experience is one approach to active learning (Bovill, 2020), and studies show that, while students may at first be unsure about how to help shape a course, giving them the opportunity to do so can increase student investment in learning, their sense of empowerment, and positive perceptions of the professor (DiClementi and Handelsman, 2005; Hudd, 2003; Jafar, 2016).

How might I do this?

Allow students leadership roles during class sessions; give them opportunities to share their expertise

Why does this matter?

Students come to our classrooms with their own lived experiences. Some educational psychologists refer to these lived experiences as “capital” and suggest that our students bring, for example, aspirational, linguistic, and social capital to the classroom (Yosso, 2005; Longmire-Avital, 2020). When student perspectives are included in the class conversation or in role-playing during assignments, “students come to understand their experiences, ideas and voices as meaningful and relevant” (Day and Beard, 2019), which resonates with Georgetown’s fundamental value of educating the whole person.

How might I do this?

Invite expertise
Give students leadership opportunities

Share responsibility with students for taking on other perspectives and for sustaining a productive learning community

Why does this matter?

Recognizing, articulating, and valuing others’ perspectives is essential to the development of both a genuine learning community and, ultimately, citizens of a complex twenty-first century world (Nussbaum, 2002). This imperative ties in with Ignatian pedagogical values such as People for Others and Community in Diversity. However it’s done, thoughtful, well-planned opportunities to share and engage with a range of views allow students to develop those skills and carry them outside the classroom (Day and Beard, 2019, Tanner, 2013).

How might I do this?

Consider how your own social identities are relevant to the power dynamics at play

Why does this matter?

“Educating the whole person” requires paying attention to the wholeness of the teacher as well. And students are likely already paying attention. In fact, they may carry unconscious preconceived expectations for how instructors of certain identities “should” behave in the classroom (DeSoto, 2005). Serious questions have been raised about whether students apply different standards when evaluating faculty of different social identities (Mengel et al., 2019; Reid, 2010), and they may also make different demands of teachers with different social identities (El-Alayli et al., 2018). Beyond student reactions, faculty themselves are shaped by their culture and background, and introspection about one’s identities and position—and perhaps sharing these reflections explicitly with the class—can help the teacher navigate this complex social space (Chavez and Longerbeam, 2016; Dewsbury, 2019; Martinez-Cola et al., 2018).

How might I do this?

Back to top arrow_upward