Visible Knowledge Project
Search
Project Workspace
Site Map
Contact Us
Visible Knowledge Project
Learning, Technology, Inquiry Learning, Technology, Inquiry
Home About the Project VKP Gallery People and Projects Resources
Visible Knowledge Project
Tools and Kits Glossary Journals Bibliography Related Projects Going Public Newsletter Visible Knowledge Project
About the Project
    Institutional Review Board and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
 

IRB Resource Kit

 

Purpose and Uses of this Kit
Resources
Experiences :

Experience 1
Experience 2
Experience 3


Applying for IRB Approval: the Arizona State University Experience

To view some of the model forms, you will need the Adobe Acrobat plug-in (http://www.adobe.com/)

In Fall 2001 I wrote up my VKP project and sent it to the ASU IRB (See de Jesús' IRB Form). In short, they took a very long time in responding, and their initial response was negative. There were concerns regarding subject anonymity as well as "coercion" as I was interviewing current students about their experiences in my web-based class. Time was of the essence as I was expecting the VKP film crew here in a month and really needed to get my end of the project off the ground. I turned to my Associate Dean, for help. He has been very supportive of all my work with VKP. With his intervention, the IRB quickly revised its decision and merely requested that I add three specific items to my consent form (See memo outlining changes). The project went off without a hitch, and it was extremely interesting and rewarding.

What I'm finding is that ASU in general is at a loss to evaluate scholarship on teaching and learning, particularly if it is coming from people in the Humanities. My Dean requested that I revise and resubmit my summer research grant (my VKP project) to incorporate social science methodology even though I do Asian American literature and culture. I revised this proposal and did receive summer funding, but the process underscores that while there indeed is institutional interest in SoTL, it does not translate well to RTP/grant committees. SoTL is perceived to be something that happens in our Center for Learning and Teaching--not something that I engage in as part of my research agenda. Furthermore, the weight given to quantitative vs qualitative research in the College of Public Programs (where my department is housed) places me in a weird bind. I feel as if I'm breaking new ground in terms of incorporating SoTL and my humanities training with Asian American Studies and new media pedagogies, but I am having problems translating this work into the more social science-based methodologies reified by my College.

Nevertheless, I am really pleased with the data I was able to collect, and am looking forward to creating an interactive on-line essay that incorporates my student interviews about the ways they learn in the Asian American studies classroom.

Melinda de Jesús, VKP Independent Investigator
Arizona State University

de Jesús'  Consent Form

de Jesús' IRB Form