Visible Knowledge Project
Search
Project Workspace
Site Map
Contact Us
Visible Knowledge Project
Learning, Technology, Inquiry Learning, Technology, Inquiry
Home About the Project VKP Gallery People and Projects Resources
Visible Knowledge Project
Tools and Kits Glossary Journals Bibliography Related Projects Going Public Newsletter Visible Knowledge Project
About the Project
    Institutional Review Board and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
 

IRB Resource Kit

 

Purpose and Uses of this Kit
Resources
Experiences :

Experience 1
Experience 2
Experience 3


IRB and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning:
The Youngstown Experience

It’s ironic but true that as humanists relatively few of us study actual humans, or at least not in ways that require us to engage with the Institutional Review Boards at our schools. One of the scariest challenges of getting involved with scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) can be writing the first IRB application. When I started my first project, I consulted with a colleague in the School of Education, who does ethnographic research in elementary education. He sent me copies of his IRB statements, which mostly confused me and certainly intimidated me, but a phone call to the director of grants and sponsored programs reassured me. At Youngstown most SoTL falls under the “exempt” category, because we’re doing educational research with adults. So filing for approval is relatively easy: write up a description of the project, including how you will gather evidence and how you will protect students from being adversely affected, and include copies of a consent letter and any surveys, interview prompts, or think-aloud protocols you plan to use.

Ah, but what about those? This won’t be a popular sentiment, but I’ve found that the IRB process helps me be more methodical in my research, because it asks me to plan more comprehensively in advance. I have to map out what I plan to do fairly carefully, yet I have never felt that I had to clear every in-class assessment or revision of a survey with the IRB. My sense is that what they are most concerned with is protecting students, and as long as my overall plan and my consent letter ensures that students’ grades won’t be affected by the project and that their identities will be protected, the IRB folks have been content.

At the same time, having to present this work to the IRB has made me much more thoughtful about the ethics of SoTL. Unlike my disciplinary research, which uses public documents, much of them created and used by people who are long dead, SoTL draws on the ideas and experiences of real people with whom I interact regularly, for whom I am responsible, and whose welfare concerns me. That’s actually part of what I like about this work.

Sherry Linkon
Youngstown State University

Sherry Linkon's Consent Form